```Date: Sep 23, 2017 2:18 PM
Author: Markus Klyver
Subject: Re: 0 = 1

Den lĂ¶rdag 23 september 2017 kl. 02:50:08 UTC+2 skrev Conway:> On Friday, September 22, 2017 at 3:30:10 PM UTC-5, Markus Klyver wrote:> > Den fredag 22 september 2017 kl. 16:02:12 UTC+2 skrev Conway:> > > On Friday, September 22, 2017 at 6:05:39 AM UTC-5, Markus Klyver wrote:> > > > Den fredag 22 september 2017 kl. 04:20:06 UTC+2 skrev conway:> > > > > > > > > > > > And a dimension is not a line, and Euclid said no> > > > > > such thing. Please stop being stupid on the Internet,> > > > > > thank you.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Markus> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Busted......apologize...admit you were wrong....or cease receiving replies from me.....> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimension> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > here it is again in case you don't like the wiki...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.dictionary.com/browse/dimensions> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Id ask you to stop being a troll on the internet...but...that's like asking the sun not to shine.......> > > > > > > > > > Good Luck to you Markus> > > > > > > > I don't see how this supports your case. If we are talking about physical measurements, then 0 has no dimension. If we are talking about some other concept of dimension in mathematics, it has to be more precise. In what way is 0 a dimension???!> > > > > > markus> > > > > > if we are talking about physical measurements.....then 0 has a dimension.  Can you show me NO dimension.  You can not.  EVERY where you look there is dimension. If I write zero...it has a dimension.  If I draw a dot, it has a dimension.  (disregarding Euclid).   I do agree however that I should work on more precise definitions.> > > > > > > > > zero is the least of numbers> > > numbers represent existence> > > the least of existence ALWAYS contains a dimension.> > > zero represents dimension "without a value" inside of it.> > > A cup that is empty is zero> > > A cup that is full is the number 1> > > > > > A line is a dimension that has values(a set of numbers) inside it. > > > A line that has no values inside it...is zero.> > > > A real number has no unit, and is obviously dimensionless. If you are using an other notion of dimension than for physical measurements, you need to define it because otherwise you are not making any sense. And then you go on and claim even more nonsensical and bizarre things. How is a cup the number 1, exactly?  How can a line have values? How do numbers represent existence?> > > > You are not making sense and coherence in anything you are saying is lacking.> > If you can not understand how a line has values...then you are not a human.  If you do not understand how numbers represent existence...well clearly you lie here....I have utterly failed to explain my self to you Markus....(also others).  In this regard I have nothing else to say to you....unless you something changes on your end....good luck!Lines are sets of points. How are sets of points values? You are not making sense.
```