Date: Oct 3, 2017 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: The objects that Newton played with were called infinite series<br> but had ZERO to do with infinity. The name infinite series is a misnomer.
I didn't say the product has a limit, where
did I write this? Can you show me? What
are you bragging about?
Is this your parrot touret syndrom, posting
shit over other peoples posts?
Am Dienstag, 3. Oktober 2017 23:39:00 UTC+2 schrieb John Gabriel:
> On Tuesday, 3 October 2017 17:35:54 UTC-4, burs...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Can you make an example, where I cannot form
> > the partial sums of s*t, despite that s or t,
> > is not convergent?
> You may form the product Birdbrains, but it has no meaning. What part of that is still overwhelming your birdbrain circuits?
> > Do you understand what we mean by formally
> > multiplying?
> Chuckle. It means you having a vasectomy as soon as possible. The world cannot afford to have another BIG MORON like you! Hurry and do it soon!
> > P.S.: I am refering to your claim:
> > So whats your example?
> > > On Saturday, 30 September 2017 13:42:44 UTC-5, burs...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > Formally you can multiply two series, even if they
> > > > are not coverging.
> > > Tsk, tsk. No. You cannot do infino-sero arithmetic with
> > > series that do not converge. Period.
> > Am Dienstag, 3. Oktober 2017 23:30:02 UTC+2 schrieb John Gabriel:
> > > On Tuesday, 3 October 2017 17:15:59 UTC-4, burs...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > Can you make an example, where two series cannot
> > > > be multiplied formally, independent of their
> > > > convergence?
> > >
> > > Birdbrains. It makes no sense to multiply any two series unless they both converge. The idea is that you are multiplying the LIMITs by multiplying the partial sums.
> > >
> > > YOU BIG MOOOOOOROOOOOOON!!!!