Date: Oct 3, 2017 6:51 PM
Author: Dan Christensen
Subject: Re: Finally the discussion is over: S = Lim S is a bad definition.

On Tuesday, October 3, 2017 at 6:03:53 PM UTC-4, John Gabriel wrote:
> Finally the discussion is over: S = Lim S is a bad definition.
>


Yup, that was your biggest blunder yet, Troll Boy. And that's saying a LOT!

You mistakenly attributed "S = Lim S" to Euler, but when I confronted you with the evidence, even you had to concede, "Of course he [Euler] did not write 'Lim S'... He did not talk about S." (May 27, 2017)

A sane person would have apologized for the error and left it that. But not you, eh, Troll Boy?


Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 software at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com