Date: Oct 4, 2017 2:33 AM
Author: plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
Subject: o-:^>___? Dan Christensen wins 2017 Nobel prize in logic-- for<br> elucidation of what is distinct and not distinct


       o-:^>___?
       `~~c--^c'

The Nobel Committee cited Dan's achievement in logic:

On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 10:08:09 AM UTC-6, Peter Percival wrote:
> Dan Christensen wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 9:47:32 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 8:27:19 AM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 9:16:52 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> >>>> PAGE58, 8-3, True Geometry / correcting axioms, 1by1 tool, angles of logarithmic spiral, conic sections unified regular polyhedra, Leaf-Triangle, Unit Basis Vector
> >>>>
> >>>> The axioms that are in need of fixing is the axiom that between any two points lies a third new point.

> >>>
> >>> The should be "between and any two DISTINCT points."
> >>>

> >>
> >> What a monsterous fool you are
> >>

> >
> > OMG. You are serious. Stupid and proud of it.

>
> And yet Mr Plutonium is right.  Two points are distinct (else they would
> be one) and it is not necessary to say so.
>


Mike Moroney: What Dan has given us today is the ability to recognize that University of Western Ontario is not Oxford University and is not Cambridge University, but distinct from them, should you be caught walking along the cobblestones of one, you cannot be at the other two.