Date: Oct 5, 2017 7:24 AM
Author: needspy@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Finally the discussion is over: S = Lim S is a bad definition.

????? ?????????????? 5 ?????? ?.?. 2017 18 ?????? 20 ???? 43 ?????? UTC+7, John Gabriel ????????:
> On Tuesday, 3 October 2017 18:03:53 UTC-4, John Gabriel wrote:
> > Finally the discussion is over: S = Lim S is a bad definition.
> >
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBOs-Xf_UIg
> >
> > Comments are unwelcome and will be ignored.
> >
> > Posted on this newsgroup in the interests of public education and to eradicate ignorance and stupidity from mainstream mythmatics.
> >
> > gilstrang@gmail.com (MIT)
> > huizenga@psu.edu (HARVARD)
> > andersk@mit.edu (MIT)
> > david.ullrich@math.okstate.edu (David Ullrich)
> > djoyce@clarku.edu
> > markcc@gmail.com

>
> The conclusion is that Euler's definition is ill-formed and the orangutans of the past 300 years have shame written all over their stupid faces.


https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=883010801853912&set=a.397252653763065.1073741825.100004350013006&type=3&theater