```Date: Oct 6, 2017 1:39 AM
Author: zelos.malum@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Unreal fiction numbers implies unreal fiction angles too

Den torsdag 5 oktober 2017 kl. 15:44:19 UTC+2 skrev FromTheRafters:> It happens that Zelos Malum formulated :> > Den torsdag 5 oktober 2017 kl. 14:29:02 UTC+2 skrev FromTheRafters:> >> Zelos Malum used his keyboard to write :> >>> Den torsdag 5 oktober 2017 kl. 11:46:45 UTC+2 skrev bassam king karzeddin:> >>>> On Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 12:00:52 PM UTC+3, Zelos Malum wrote:> >>>>> Dipshit, there are no approximations! Show us one fucking approximation > >>>>> ever in these!> >>>> > >>>>  I'am who is asking to show only one existing triangle with EXACTLY know > >>>> sides such that one of its angles is integer degree angle (n), where (n) > >>>> is  simply not divisible by (3) > >>>> > >>>>  BKK> >>> > >>> how about a triangle with angles 1, 2 and 97 degrees? Nothing inexact > >>> there,  give the side opposite of the 1 degree angle length 1, then the > >>> length of the  other two sides are L_2=1*sin(2 degrees)/sin(1 degrees) and > >>> L_97=1*sin(97  degrees)/sin(1 degrees)> >>> > >>> EXACTLY, no approximations there.> >>> > >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_sines> >>> > >>> Holy shit, you failed basic geometry and are an engineer? Tell me what > >>> you've  made so I know what to stay away from! They must be deathtraps > >>> considering  how incompetent in basic mathematics you are.> >> > >> ...and the three angles of a triangle all add up to?> >> > COmplete and utter brainfart on my side, you are absolutely correct, of > > course I meant 1, 2 and 177, replace the numbers and it is correct.> >> > Thank you for correcting it.> > It seemed a silly correction to make, but I couldn't help myself. It is > obvious to me that you know what you are talking about and it was, as > you said, a brain fart.Well small corrections like those gives the cranks less of a reason to get hung up on.
```