Date: Oct 6, 2017 6:35 AM
Author: FromTheRafters
Subject: Re: Unreal fiction numbers implies unreal fiction angles too

Zelos Malum formulated the question :
> Den torsdag 5 oktober 2017 kl. 15:44:19 UTC+2 skrev FromTheRafters:
>> It happens that Zelos Malum formulated :
>>> Den torsdag 5 oktober 2017 kl. 14:29:02 UTC+2 skrev FromTheRafters:
>>>> Zelos Malum used his keyboard to write :
>>>>> Den torsdag 5 oktober 2017 kl. 11:46:45 UTC+2 skrev bassam king
>>>>> karzeddin:

>>>>>> On Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 12:00:52 PM UTC+3, Zelos Malum wrote:
>>>>>>> Dipshit, there are no approximations! Show us one fucking approximation
>>>>>>> ever in these!

>>>>>> I'am who is asking to show only one existing triangle with EXACTLY know
>>>>>> sides such that one of its angles is integer degree angle (n), where (n)
>>>>>> is simply not divisible by (3)
>>>>>> BKK

>>>>> how about a triangle with angles 1, 2 and 97 degrees? Nothing inexact
>>>>> there, give the side opposite of the 1 degree angle length 1, then the
>>>>> length of the other two sides are L_2=1*sin(2 degrees)/sin(1 degrees)
>>>>> and L_97=1*sin(97 degrees)/sin(1 degrees)
>>>>> EXACTLY, no approximations there.
>>>>> Holy shit, you failed basic geometry and are an engineer? Tell me what
>>>>> you've made so I know what to stay away from! They must be deathtraps
>>>>> considering how incompetent in basic mathematics you are.

>>>> ...and the three angles of a triangle all add up to?

>>> COmplete and utter brainfart on my side, you are absolutely correct, of
>>> course I meant 1, 2 and 177, replace the numbers and it is correct.
>>> Thank you for correcting it.

>> It seemed a silly correction to make, but I couldn't help myself. It is
>> obvious to me that you know what you are talking about and it was, as
>> you said, a brain fart.

> Well small corrections like those gives the cranks less of a reason to get
> hung up on.

That's why I bothered to do it, I imagined some cranks (plenty to
choose from) might pounce. :)