Date: Oct 6, 2017 3:42 PM
Author: bursejan@gmail.com
Subject: Re: I rarely make silly mistakes, but Euler made a huge blunder in S<br> = Lim S

I guess he means 
{ (-?, m) u (m, k), (k, n) u (n, ?) }
Thats kind of nitpicking.

Am Freitag, 6. Oktober 2017 21:33:00 UTC+2 schrieb Markus Klyver:
> No, the set { (m, k), (k, n) } is not the same set as { (-?, m), (m, k), (k, n), (n, ?) }. You're wrong as usual, crank.