Date: Jun 18, 2003 10:36 PM
Author: Brian  Quincy  Hutchings
Subject: Re: Tautologies, math, and Wiles's work

the item on "group analogy to perfect numbers" sounds like
it's just this sort of thing.

Dan wrote:
> 
> Call a finite group G "Group perfect" if
> ths sum of the orders of the proper normal subgroups of G
> equals the order of G (*) .
> 
> The cyclic group C_n has the property (*) iff n is a perfect number .
> 
> Are there also non-abelian groups with this property ?
> 
> Thanks

http://arxiv.org/abs/math.GR/0104012

galathaea@excite.com (galathaea) wrote in message news:<b22ffac3.0306172136.40a4c9@posting.google.com>...
 
> The modular Galois representations were shown by Ribet to have
> properties in contradiction to the four properties listed above for
> the representation associated to E.  Thus E does not have a modular
> representation.

--A church-school McCrusade (Blair's ideals?):
Harry-the-Mad-Potter want's US to kill Iraqis?...
http://www.tarpley.net/bush25.htm ("Thyroid Storm" ch.)
  http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/plates/plates.html
   http://quincy4board.homestead.com/files/curriculum/Cosmo.PCX