Date: Apr 8, 2011 4:30 AM
Author: camgirls@hush.com
Subject: Re: SKEPTICS SHOULD HAVE LABOTAMIES NOT LABORATORIES !!!

On Apr 8, 6:27 pm, Sylvia Else <syl...@not.here.invalid> wrote:
> On 4/04/2011 12:29 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

> > James Randi's new book coming out...
>
> > THE MAGICIAN IN THE LABORATORY!
>
> > I'm going to write my own
>
> > THE UNTESTED MINDREADER
> > Cherry Picking Applications Is Not "Good Science" Randi!

>
> > ------------------------------
>
> > Actually if Skeptics all had labotamies I would have passed a psychic
> > test 10 years ago!

>
> > All they have to do is listen to the applicants and follow the test
> > instructions, but none of them do, the $1,000,000 and $100,000AU
> > competition prizes are actually for a DEBATING COMPETITION!  You have
> > to prove your claim is worthy, i.e. make a legallly tight contract of
> > the unprovable being provable!

>
> Graham, your original claim to Randi was manifestly untestable. Despite
> multiple attempts online, you have failed to construct a testable claim
> which you can then substantiate. Why should Randi listen to you?
>
> Sylvia



stop lying.

standard placebo test, which I detailed to aus skeptics.

subjective is a mole hill, not a 10 year mountain.