Date: Nov 1, 2011 5:41 AM
Author: admformeto
Subject: Re: Einstein relativity theory disproven by Electrical Engineer.



"jim" <retnuh2011@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:f3911c8c-1fef-422a-ae03-4d6b103ef031@m19g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 1, 5:17 am, "admformeto" <admform...@onet.eu> wrote:
>> "jim" <retnuh2...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:c006bc6e-f31e-4e99-a746-f62c7219e519@f36g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Oct 31, 1:31 am, "admformeto" <admform...@onet.eu> wrote:
>> >> "Koobee Wublee" <koobee.wub...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:a8aa98dc-053e-4f60-a17d-26f80aea9e94@z28g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> >> > On Oct 30, 3:58 pm, "admformeto" <admform...@onet.eu> wrote:
>> >> >> "Arend Lammertink" <lam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> > Just recently, I have been able to disprove Einstein's relativity
>> >> >> > theory once and for all. It is based on a fundamental thinking 
>> >> >> > error
>> >> >> > when formulating the Maxwell equations. Maxwell assumed the 
>> >> >> > fields
>> >> >> > to
>> >> >> > be caused by matter, while we know matter and (particular) EM 
>> >> >> > waves
>> >> >> > are one and the same thing. So, how can matter be the cause for 
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> > fields, if these same fields are causing the matter to exist? 
>> >> >> > When
>> >> >> > you correct for that error, really the floor drops from 
>> >> >> > underneath
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> > whole relativity theory...
>>
>> >> >> Maxwell did not make any errors and he correctly modeled EM wave
>> >> >> propagation
>> >> >> including a case where EM waves propagate trough the vacuum of 
>> >> >> empty
>> >> >> space
>> >> >> for which he assigned artificial constant just to satisfy the math
>> >> >> agreement
>> >> >> with 'c' the speed of light which agrees with speed of radio waves
>> >> >> generated
>> >> >> by normal source like an antenna.
>>
>> >> > This is not true.  Maxwell?s equations predict a medium for light to
>> >> > propagate through at a constant speed relative to the stationary
>> >> > background of this medium.  In doing so, what is observed as empty
>> >> > vacuum exists this illusive and still undetected medium that gives 
>> >> > the
>> >> > properties of the permeability and the permittivity in free space.
>> >> > <shrug>
>>
>> >> In geometry if you claim precise dimension you must have precise
>> >> reference
>> >> points.
>> >> And just how does Maxwell manages to find the reference points of such
>> >> medium?
>>
>> >   You don't have to. Since the people who actually know how geometry
>> >   actually works, discovered infinite dimensional geometry for the
>> >   cranks in physics over a hundred years. Just like  the people who
>> > understand
>> >   numbers, discovered set theory, topology, Goedel's Theorems, and
>> > Turing Machines.
>> >   Rather than just simply rediscovering logarithms forever.
>>
>> Are you one of those people?
>> If so, please explain how does one find reference points in empty space
>> using higher dimensions.
>> Better still, please explain how does one measure curved space.
>
>   That's just the way it is. Since the people who actually
> understand
>    the jerk curved space, discovered Dark Matter, rather than jerk
> curved space.
>

Well, I guess then you are not one of them...