Date: Nov 1, 2011 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: A definition of an infinity, perhaps!?
WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 1 Nov., 20:03, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > So when we add the complete first column we do no have to add a line
> > index.
> > So whether or not we have a complete first column the set of line
> > indexes
> > is identical to the set of column indexes. Stop claiming that if the
> > first
> > column is complete there must be more lines than columns.
> If the first column is complete and if an actually infinite (complete)
> string of digits is to carry any mathematical meaning or can be
> detected by mathematical means then there must be more lines than
Since one can still biject the set of lines with the set of columns,
WM's "more" is at best ambiguous, and is, otherwise, just another of his