Math Forum Discussions - Re: Why time can't be a dimension

Date: Mar 7, 2012 4:01 PM
Author: vtcapo
Subject: Re: Why time can't be a dimension

On Mar 7, 3:04 pm, "microm2...@hotmail.com" <microm2...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> On Mar 7, 11:57 am, vtcapo <vtc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 7, 2:51 pm, "microm2...@hotmail.com" <microm2...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 6, 8:23 pm, vtcapo <vtc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Mar 6, 8:14 pm, "microm2...@hotmail.com" <microm2...@hotmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Mar 6, 4:58 pm, vtcapo <vtc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Mar 6, 7:50 pm, "microm2...@hotmail.com" <microm2...@hotmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Mar 6, 3:02 pm, vtcapo <vtc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Mar 6, 3:03 pm, "microm2...@hotmail.com" <microm2...@hotmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > On Mar 6, 9:59 am, vtcapo <vtc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 8:13 pm, "microm2...@hotmail.com" <microm2...@hotmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 5:03 pm, vtcapo <vtc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 1:57 pm, "microm2...@hotmail.com" <microm2...@hotmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 4, 6:03 pm, vtcapo <vtc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 4, 6:48 pm, "microm2...@hotmail.com" <microm2...@hotmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 4, 3:31 pm, vtcapo <vtc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 4, 1:50 pm, "microm2...@hotmail.com" <microm2...@hotmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 4, 5:48 am, vtcapo <vtc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 3, 10:58 pm, "microm2...@hotmail.com" <microm2...@hotmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Its substance shares dimensionality of space. But it is unidrectional
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > or forward alone.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All dimensions have two directions. Time does not.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry Mitchell but I would have to disagree. Paranormal experiences
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with a psychic I frequented in the early 70?s revealed to me that he
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would travel to the Akashic Record, that place where time, past,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > present and future all exist at the same time. One wrinkle in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fabric of time is that the future is probable, hence numerous possible
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > futures.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The poor or inconsistent results associated with psychic readings is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > due to the less gifted being unable to correlate the causes and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > effects, past and present to determine which probable future is most
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > likely to result. According to him, everything is recorded. Every
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thought, word or deed is recorded in the Aether. He would travel inter-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dimensionally to view these possible futures to make his
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > prognostications.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, if this is to woo woo for you to grasp I perfectly understand.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, let me just say that the above is based on someone who
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DEMONSTATED the truth of his explanation by making numerous extremely
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > accurate predictions that ALL came true for over 40 years.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you have to back up your accusation?  Please don?t tell me you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > read it in a book?..
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RT
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Order only goes forward....
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So what you are suggesting is that time only moves forward.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Order only goes forward..
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch; the prize
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Brilliant! Who have you convinced, yourself?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > RT- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Some people go backward.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > And some cannot think out of the box because they are confined within
> > > > > > > > > > > > it.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Did you always color within the lines?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > RT- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > > > I will leave you with the crayons...
>
> > > > > > > > > > Let?s see, what do we have?  Time?
>
> > > > > > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > > > > > > > > > Its substance shares dimensionality of space. But it is unidrectional
> > > > > > > > > > or forward alone.
> > > > > > > > > > All dimensions have two directions. Time does not.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Daryl McCullough
> > > > > > > > > > Time has two directions: the past, and the future.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Time is a *theoretical* construct. That theoretical construct has two
> > > > > > > > > > directions.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Frederick Williams
> > > > > > > > > > What evidence is there that there is a future?  The evidence that
> > > > > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > > > is a past is not very convincing.
>
> > > > > > > > > > KBH
> > > > > > > > > > The fourth dimension is a coordinate system identification or
> > > > > > > > > > coordinate system ID .
>
> > > > > > > > > > Alfonso
> > > > > > > > > > Time and space are inter-related by ?definition and not due to some
> > > > > > > > > > inherent property of nature. As Essen ?says it is possible to make
> > > > > > > > > > such a system of units work but it does not ?constitute a "theory" and
> > > > > > > > > > serves no useful purpose.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Uwe Hayek.
> > > > > > > > > > Besides, it is Minkowski himself that stated that time and space were
> > > > > > > > > > merged. If he had had more knowledge about dimensional vectors, then
> > > > > > > > > > he ?would have realized that this meant that time is not a separate
> > > > > > > > > > dimension.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Yousuf Khan
> > > > > > > > > > That doesn't preclude it from being a dimension, it just means its an
> > > > > > > > > > uni-directional dimension.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Micky
> > > > > > > > > > But if time is a dimension and it only goes in one direction, then not
> > > > > > > > > > all dimensions have two directions.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > > > > > > > > > There is only a universal Now everywhere since the absolute beginning
> > > > > > > > > > of time...
>
> > > > > > > > > > To be honest, Mitchell's last statement is correct for those of us
> > > > > > > > > > confined to the physical word.  But speaking from experience, this
> > > > > > > > > > does not answer the fact that in the Astral, time does NOT exist, only
> > > > > > > > > > the impressions it leaves behind in the physical.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Therefore the questions one should be asking are:
> > > > > > > > > > 1.      Where or what is the Astral dimension?
> > > > > > > > > > 2.      What is the Akasha or Akashic Record?
> > > > > > > > > > 3.      What is the mechanism that allows a psychic to travel out of body
> > > > > > > > > > to access this record?
> > > > > > > > > > 4.      Why is Israel using the Bible Code to ascertain probable futures?
>
> > > > > > > > > > To truly understand Time you should be asking the Israelis who are
> > > > > > > > > > working with the Bible Code.  They know that past, present and all
> > > > > > > > > > futures as well as the prospects of all future events are accessible
> > > > > > > > > > via the Akasha. The Bible Code being a matrix that allows you to read
> > > > > > > > > > it.
>
> > > > > > > > > > But then again, if you are confined to the box you will never asks
> > > > > > > > > > these questions. An understanding of Time is beyond our current
> > > > > > > > > > physics and textbook theories.
>
> > > > > > > > > > RT
> > > > > > > > > > PS Mitchell, I put away my crayons a long time ago.
>
> > > > > > > > > Its time to go back to the drawing board.
>
> > > > > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
>
> > > > > > > > > > I think it?s about
> > > > > > > > > > time you put yours away or pass them on to your children.  Hopefully
> > > > > > > > > > you will tell them that it is not necessary to color within the lines?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > You are referring to yourself? I went to school for aeronautical
> > > > > > > > engineering.
>
> > > > > > > > I did my time on the drawing board....
>
> > > > > > > > RT- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > What time direction are you in?
> > > > > > > All dimensions are two sided...
>
> > > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
>
> > > > > > Real Time....
>
> > > > > You mean versus imaginary?
>
> > > > > > RT- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > No...Real time experiences.
>
> > > > And what may I ask are your experiences?
>
> > > The two times are the day from rotation and the
> > > year from Earth orbit...
> > > That is my two time experience...
>
> > > Mitchell Raemsch
>
> > > > RT- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > That's why....-
>
> Not at all....
> Day and years have only one direction...
>
> Mitchell Raemsch
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -

Mitchell, we are on different pages. You are talking physics. I am
talking meta-physics.

Can we meet somewhere in between?

RT