Date: Apr 9, 2012 5:58 PM
Author: Halitsky
Subject: Re: Correct way to normalize an rmsd-based distance metric used in<br> repeated trials of pairs

sci.stat.math "ate" part of the above post !!!

This:

"According to our hypothesis, case (a) results when the input pairs
to
Arthur's program reflect a highly-conserved condition dating back to
the earliest stages of protein evolution ORDERLY (non-random)
fashion."

should have read this:

"According to our hypothesis, case (a) results when the input pairs to
Arthur's program reflect a highly-conserved condition dating back to
the earliest stages of protein evolution, while case (b) results when
the input pairs have mutated away from this earliest condition, but in
a similar (orderly) way, not in an entirely random fashion."