Date: Sep 9, 2012 9:21 PM
Author: Paul A. Tanner III
Subject: Re: What's the Meaning of "Direct Instruction"?
This is not about the classroom. Stick to what you actually did. This is about you denigrating bilingual union people who choose to communicate in both languages their concerns that they do not want to see their ability to be paid well for their work go to hell - as you want to see their ability to get paid well go to hell.
This is about union-hating conservatives - even those hypocrite conservatives who like some we know have personally benefited from having jobs covered by the benefits of collective bargaining, promoting the very severely morally challenged, "As long as I get paid well with good benefits like good health care, to hell with whether anyone else does."
And this is about white conservative xenophobia with respect to Spanish culture, a resentment that communicates, "OMG! We're being invaded!" - which is BS racist language I have heard again and again on right-wing talk radio over these past few years even just from channel-surfing in the car.
It's disgusting, and that you fan these flames of bigotry is disgusting.
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Wayne Bishop <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> As I said, "keep up the good work." With your head buried deeply in the
> sand, you are supporting limiting the futures of the very people you believe
> you are helping.
> At 07:44 PM 9/8/2012, Paul Tanner wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Wayne Bishop <email@example.com> wrote:
>> At 12:59 PM 9/8/2012, Paul Tanner wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Wayne Bishop <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>>> Great! Signs in both English and Spanish!
>> The Spanish are coming, the Spanish are coming!
>> No, another generation of 3rd (being generous) class citizens are coming.
>> By design.
>> I happen to like real bilingual education - my wife was certified and
>> in bilingual (English/Spanish) classrooms, our (non-Mexican) children are
>> (or were in their prime) completely bilingual in English and Spanish (not
>> Mexican one, unfortunately), and two of my grandchildren (each half
>> are (at 8 and 6) shockingly fluent in Mandarin because of the real
>> immersion charter school that they are privileged to attend. Not the
>> urban lie for which Alice Callaghan (head of a shelter for abused, almost
>> all Hispanic been many illegal, women and their families) who lent her
>> to the Prop 227 initiative here in California after leading (from behind)
>> walkout of 9th Street Elementary here in LAUSD with this statement, "This
>> the only Politically Incorrect thing I've ever done." Why? Because their
>> education was entirely in Spanish and demonstrably ineffectual (in any
>> language). Excusing the inexcusable makes for good liberal politics,
>> however, so keep up the good work.
> All of what you said above is irrelevant to the point being made. How?
> Simple. White conservatives who speak only English promote the banning
> of Spanish in school and in otherwise "official" contexts because they
> say the country should have an official language that is the main
> language of the majority culture. But one of these days, the US is
> going to become majority Hispanic and at least Spanish-speaking, the
> way the demographic trends are. One wonders whether these white
> conservatives who speak only English will be consistent and then push
> for everything "official" to be done only in Spanish, forcing
> themselves to have to learn the main language of the majority culture
> - - you know, because according to true blue conservative principles,
> there ought to be an official language that is the main language of
> the majority culture, and everyone should be forced to learn the main
> language of the majority culture.