Date: Nov 1, 2012 5:00 AM
Author: Hercules ofZeus
Subject: Re: CANTORS PROOF IS JUST THE INDUCTIVE STEP!
On Nov 1, 6:37 pm, William Elliot <ma...@panix.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Hercules ofZeus wrote:

> > > > INDUCTION RULE:

>

> > > > P(1) & P(n)->P(S(n))

> > > > --> ALL(n) P(n)

>

> > > You're wrong. The induction rule is:

> > > P(1) & ALL(n)(P(n) -> P(S(n))) -> ALL(n) P(n).

>

> > OK, in my new logic forall is variable function that uses the double

> > instantiaion rule.

>

> > p(1) ^ N(p(N)->p(s(N))

> > -> N(p(N))

>

> What's N?

>

> > CAPS = VARIABLES

>

> CAPS is a variable?

>

> > lower = terms / function terms.

>

> > i.e. the scope of N(...) is wider than the same variable name

> > (...N...)

>

> Huh?

>

> > Just my new high order logic syntax forwww.microPROLOG.com!

>

> Wow, a high order of junk logic.

>

Hey if you don't like the final frontier in mathematics..

p(1) ^ N(p(N)->p(s(N))

-> N(p(N))

I gain no benefit by sharing..

Herc

--

www.microPROLOG.com

if( if(t(S),f(R)) , if(t(R),f(S)) ).

if the sun's out then it's not raining

ergo

if it's raining then the sun's not out