Date: Nov 16, 2012 4:42 PM
Author: Achimota
Subject: topology definition question
It seems the most "common" definition of a topology is that T is a topology on a set X if

1. empty set is in T and

2. X is in T and

3. A and B are in T ==> A intersection B is in T and

4. {A_i} in T ==> Union A_i is in T.

But some authors imply that only 3 and 4 are necessary for the definition of a topology. For example, Kelley ("General Topology", 1955, page 37) only uses 3 and 4 and says that these imply X is in T. McCarty ("Topology...", page 87) says 1 and 2 are "completely unneeded".

My question is, is it really possible to exclude 1 and 2 from the definition such that 3 and 4 alone imply 1 and 2?

Suppose X:={x,y,z} and T:={ {x},{y},{x,y} }.

Then T satisfies conditions 3 and 4, but yet X is not in T.

So how is it possible to exclude 3 from the definition of a topology?

Many thanks in advance,

Dan