Date: Nov 17, 2012 10:42 PM
Author: Uirgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 152

In article 
<ace820dc-9361-4752-bdfe-082e8d83afcd@ib4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 17 Nov., 21:21, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> > (nor is there a problem that WM two limits are different)-
>
> Interesting. A nice claim.
> The limit of a sequence may depend on the method which is used to
> calculate it? Perhaps it may even depend on the person who calculates
> it?


When WM calculates it, the result may also depend on WHEN he calculates
it, as there is no guarantee that WM will get the same result twice n a
row!
>
> Piffle. Mathematics serves as a tool to predict scientific results.

Among many other uses, some of which have no scientific applications.


>
> Therefore the result of set theory is humbug.


Only when set theory is being mis-manipulated by humbugs like WM.