Date: Nov 17, 2012 10:42 PM
Author: Uirgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 152
In article

<ace820dc-9361-4752-bdfe-082e8d83afcd@ib4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,

WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 17 Nov., 21:21, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > (nor is there a problem that WM two limits are different)-

>

> Interesting. A nice claim.

> The limit of a sequence may depend on the method which is used to

> calculate it? Perhaps it may even depend on the person who calculates

> it?

When WM calculates it, the result may also depend on WHEN he calculates

it, as there is no guarantee that WM will get the same result twice n a

row!

>

> Piffle. Mathematics serves as a tool to predict scientific results.

Among many other uses, some of which have no scientific applications.

>

> Therefore the result of set theory is humbug.

Only when set theory is being mis-manipulated by humbugs like WM.