Date: Nov 17, 2012 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: Matheology � 152
WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 17 Nov., 21:21, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > (nor is there a problem that WM two limits are different)-
> Interesting. A nice claim.
> The limit of a sequence may depend on the method which is used to
> calculate it? Perhaps it may even depend on the person who calculates
When WM calculates it, the result may also depend on WHEN he calculates
it, as there is no guarantee that WM will get the same result twice n a
> Piffle. Mathematics serves as a tool to predict scientific results.
Among many other uses, some of which have no scientific applications.
> Therefore the result of set theory is humbug.
Only when set theory is being mis-manipulated by humbugs like WM.