Date: Nov 17, 2012 10:42 PM
Author: Uirgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 152

In article 
WM <> wrote:

> On 17 Nov., 21:21, William Hughes <> wrote:

> > (nor is there a problem that WM two limits are different)-
> Interesting. A nice claim.
> The limit of a sequence may depend on the method which is used to
> calculate it? Perhaps it may even depend on the person who calculates
> it?

When WM calculates it, the result may also depend on WHEN he calculates
it, as there is no guarantee that WM will get the same result twice n a
> Piffle. Mathematics serves as a tool to predict scientific results.

Among many other uses, some of which have no scientific applications.

> Therefore the result of set theory is humbug.

Only when set theory is being mis-manipulated by humbugs like WM.