Date: Nov 18, 2012 1:02 PM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 152
On 18 Nov., 18:45, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Nov 18, 7:13 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>

> > On 17 Nov., 23:08, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > > On Nov 17, 5:23 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>

> > > > On 17 Nov., 21:21, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > > > > (nor is there a problem that WM two limits are different)-

>

> > > > Interesting. A nice claim.

> > > > The limit of a sequence may depend on the method which is used to

> > > > calculate it?

>

> > > Nope, but it does depend on which limit is used.

>

> > The Cauchy-limit or the Cantor-limit?

>

> Niether.

>

> The fact that in Wolkenmuekenheim the two limits

> are assumed to be the same does

> not mean that you are using the same limit both times.

Is it correct in mathematics to claim:

1/((((((10^0)/10)+10^1)/10)+10^2)/10)+? = 0 ?

And is it also correcr to claim

1/((((((10^0)/10)+10^1)/10)+10^2)/10)+? > 1 ?

Is it is therefore correct to claim 0 > 1?

Or can you give some guidelines for beginners, when and why which of

the limits has to be applied?

Regards, WM