```Date: Nov 28, 2012 10:14 AM
Author: John Jens
Subject: Re: From Fermat little theorem to Fermat Last Theorem

On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 4:09:43 PM UTC+2, Frederick Williams wrote:> John Jens wrote:> > > > > > Corrections was made.> > > > > > It's sufficient that only a < p.> > > > > > If a + b â   câ ¥0 because 0<aâ ¤b<c implies b â   c < 0 ,0 â ¤ a + b â   c < a < p> > > If a + b â   c = 0 see (1)> > > If a + b â   c â ¥ 1 and because a + b â   c < a implies a â ¥ 2 and because a < p implies> > > p > 2.> > > > May I urge to stick to 7 bit ASCII?> > > > -- > > When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by > > this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him.> > Jonathan Swift: Thoughts on Various Subjects, Moral and DivertingCorrections was made. It's sufficient that only a < p. If a + b - c>=0 because 0<a<=b<c implies b - c < 0 , 0 <= a + b - c < a < p If a + b - c = 0 see (1) If a + b - c >= 1 and because a + b - c < a implies a >= 2 and because a < p implies p > 2.
```