Date: Dec 5, 2012 10:42 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 170

On 4 Dez., 19:22, "nofingers" <inva...@invalid.com> wrote:
> "WM" <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote in message
>
> news:d9d8e2b0-0bda-4a42-a057-c4caa47c3621@r14g2000vbd.googlegroups.com...
>

> >Matheology 170
>
> >The infinite triangle formed by the sequence
>
> >0.1
> >0.11
> >0.111
> >...

>
> >has height aleph_0 but width less than aleph_0 (because the limit 1/9,
> >the first line with aleph_0 digits, does not belong to the triangle).
> >This lack of symmetry is disturbing for a physicist.

>
> which physicist is this so disturbing ?   Name please.


For every physicist who understands his science.
>
> >But it would be completely unclear, what side of the infinite triangle
> >is the first one to complete infinity aleph_0, when constructed in the
> >following manner:

>
> >a
>
> >a
> >bb

>
> >c
> >ac
> >bbc

>
> <snip crap>


A person with an eartworm's brain will consider everything
mathematical as crap.

Time for you to switch to another group or to recognize that
mathematics and geometry have some propertoes in common.

Regards, WM