Date: Dec 6, 2012 4:36 AM
Subject: Re: Matheology � 170
WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 5 Dez., 19:48, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > WM has already adequately demonstrated to the world again and again that
> > he does not speak for mathematicians
> Is aleph_0 a quantity (i.e. possibly in trichotomy with other
> quantities) or not?
Not to those who, as in the case of WM, deny that it can be properly
defined as a cardinality or ordinality.
But not everyone is so negatively oriented towards such things as
general definitions of cardinality and ordinality as WM is.