Date: Dec 6, 2012 4:36 AM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 170

In article 
<cc5c24a4-0ec4-4f48-8b90-9463aed1b0fa@o6g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 5 Dez., 19:48, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>

> > WM has already adequately demonstrated to the world again and again that
> > he does not speak for mathematicians

>
> Is aleph_0 a quantity (i.e. possibly in trichotomy with other
> quantities) or not?


Not to those who, as in the case of WM, deny that it can be properly
defined as a cardinality or ordinality.

But not everyone is so negatively oriented towards such things as
general definitions of cardinality and ordinality as WM is.
--