Date: Dec 6, 2012 5:36 AM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 170

In article 
<fb9f656b-8ae6-4e38-87d1-33e24c7d9e7a@a2g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 6 Dez., 10:36, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <cc5c24a4-0ec4-4f48-8b90-9463aed1b...@o6g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> >  WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> > > On 5 Dez., 19:48, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > WM has already adequately demonstrated to the world again and again that
> > > > he does not speak for mathematicians

> >
> > > Is aleph_0 a quantity (i.e. possibly in trichotomy with other
> > > quantities) or not?

> >
> > Not to those who, as in the case of WM, deny that it can be properly
> > defined as a cardinality or ordinality.
> >
> > But not everyone is so negatively oriented towards such things as
> > general definitions of cardinality and ordinality as WM is.
> > --

>
> So, to you it is a quantity? Then we can put the question whether the
> lengths of the sides of my triangle can be in trichotomy. There is an
> angle of 45° and its sides have length 1*aleph_0 = aleph_0 and
> sqrt(2)*aleph_0 = aleph_0. Now my question: Is the third side aleph_0
> or less or larger?



Until you can show that those alleged "sides" have endpoints other that
that alleged common point, you question assumes conditions contrary to
fact.
--