Date: Dec 6, 2012 5:36 AM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 170
In article

<fb9f656b-8ae6-4e38-87d1-33e24c7d9e7a@a2g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,

WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 6 Dez., 10:36, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> > In article

> > <cc5c24a4-0ec4-4f48-8b90-9463aed1b...@o6g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,

> >

> > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> > > On 5 Dez., 19:48, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> >

> > > > WM has already adequately demonstrated to the world again and again that

> > > > he does not speak for mathematicians

> >

> > > Is aleph_0 a quantity (i.e. possibly in trichotomy with other

> > > quantities) or not?

> >

> > Not to those who, as in the case of WM, deny that it can be properly

> > defined as a cardinality or ordinality.

> >

> > But not everyone is so negatively oriented towards such things as

> > general definitions of cardinality and ordinality as WM is.

> > --

>

> So, to you it is a quantity? Then we can put the question whether the

> lengths of the sides of my triangle can be in trichotomy. There is an

> angle of 45° and its sides have length 1*aleph_0 = aleph_0 and

> sqrt(2)*aleph_0 = aleph_0. Now my question: Is the third side aleph_0

> or less or larger?

Until you can show that those alleged "sides" have endpoints other that

that alleged common point, you question assumes conditions contrary to

fact.

--