```Date: Dec 6, 2012 5:55 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 170

On 6 Dez., 11:36, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:> In article> <fb9f656b-8ae6-4e38-87d1-33e24c7d9...@a2g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,>>>>>>  WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> > On 6 Dez., 10:36, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:> > > In article> > > <cc5c24a4-0ec4-4f48-8b90-9463aed1b...@o6g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,>> > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> > > > On 5 Dez., 19:48, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:>> > > > > WM has already adequately demonstrated to the world again and again that> > > > > he does not speak for mathematicians>> > > > Is aleph_0 a quantity (i.e. possibly in trichotomy with other> > > > quantities) or not?>> > > Not to those who, as in the case of WM, deny that it can be properly> > > defined as a cardinality or ordinality.>> > > But not everyone is so negatively oriented towards such things as> > > general definitions of cardinality and ordinality as WM is.> > > -->> > So, to you it is a quantity? Then we can put the question whether the> > lengths of the sides of my triangle can be in trichotomy. There is an> > angle of 45 and its sides have length 1*aleph_0 = aleph_0 and> > sqrt(2)*aleph_0 = aleph_0. Now my question: Is the third side aleph_0> > or less or larger?>> Until you can show that those alleged "sides" have endpoints other that> that alleged common point, you question assumes conditions contrary to> fact.I can show that the endpoints are closer to the common point than theunit length time 2^aleph_0. If we can surpass them, walking along thesides of the angle, they must be somewhere.Regards, WM
```