Date: Dec 8, 2012 2:55 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 170

On 7 Dez., 22:28, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> In article
> <3f5b25b6-ae3f-4a92-96dc-49f872d0c...@c16g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>,
>
>  WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> > Correct. That is a valuable recognition! But an infinity that is less
> > than a larger infinity forces to believe in such crap.

>
> So you now publicly admit that your whole "triangle" thing is crap!
> --


As its existence depends on actual infinity it is obviously a crap.
But this implies, by contraposition, that actual infinity is a crap.
- Quod erat demonstrandum (as Euclid never said).

Regards, WM