Date: Dec 8, 2012 3:01 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 170

On 7 Dez., 22:35, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> In article
> <e903ef43-fcb6-43f7-8ce3-e61c725ff...@8g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>,
>
>  WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> > On 6 Dez., 21:29, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <a70f6b2c-c9a2-426d-9da4-70ad9785b...@o6g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,

>
> > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > > > A unit lenght 1 times aleph_0 is what?
>
> > > Nonsense!
>
> > A unit times aleph_0 is aleph_0.
>
> That presumes that Aleph_0 is amenable to some sort of multiplication
> and division.
>
> A claim that requires proof, as Aleph_0 is not a member of any of the
> sets of numbers for which multiplication is defined, and is not a unit
> of measure, like yards or metres, that can be halved or doubled
> meaningfully.
> --


Try to learn set theory, for instance here:
http://www.hs-augsburg.de/~mueckenh/GU/GU11.PPT#355,28,Folie 28
(hit the enter key twice (do you know what the enter key is?))

Regards, WM