Date: Dec 8, 2012 3:01 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 170
On 7 Dez., 22:35, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> In article

> <e903ef43-fcb6-43f7-8ce3-e61c725ff...@8g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>,

>

> WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> > On 6 Dez., 21:29, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> > > In article

> > > <a70f6b2c-c9a2-426d-9da4-70ad9785b...@o6g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,

>

> > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> > > > A unit lenght 1 times aleph_0 is what?

>

> > > Nonsense!

>

> > A unit times aleph_0 is aleph_0.

>

> That presumes that Aleph_0 is amenable to some sort of multiplication

> and division.

>

> A claim that requires proof, as Aleph_0 is not a member of any of the

> sets of numbers for which multiplication is defined, and is not a unit

> of measure, like yards or metres, that can be halved or doubled

> meaningfully.

> --

Try to learn set theory, for instance here:

http://www.hs-augsburg.de/~mueckenh/GU/GU11.PPT#355,28,Folie 28

(hit the enter key twice (do you know what the enter key is?))

Regards, WM