Date: Dec 8, 2012 3:04 AM Author: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: Matheology § 170 On 7 Dez., 22:53, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > Just that can be constructed by one angle and two complete sides.
> I note that WM acknowledges that those sides are required to be
> COMPLETE, But in his example they are not, since they both lack
> endpoints at their other (not in common) ends.
Interesting. But you believe that the natural numbers form a complete
set without an endnumber?