Date: Dec 8, 2012 4:06 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 170

On 8 Dez., 09:56, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> In article
> <8fdbe5fd-0568-4163-9913-234b1a029...@10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>,
>
>  WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> > On 7 Dez., 22:28, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <3f5b25b6-ae3f-4a92-96dc-49f872d0c...@c16g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>,

>
> > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > > > Correct. That is a valuable recognition! But an infinity that is less
> > > > than a larger infinity forces to believe in such crap.

>
> > > So you now publicly admit that your whole "triangle" thing is crap!
> > > --

>
> > As its existence depends on actual infinity it is obviously a crap.
>
> The existence of actual infinities is irrelevant.


Wrong. You have the opinion that the existence of actual infinities is
irrelevant, or more probable: You have not that opinion but you say
that you had this opinion.

Regards, WM