Date: Dec 10, 2012 12:24 PM
Author: Alan Smaill
Subject: Re: fom - 01 - preface
WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On 9 Dez., 23:40, Alan Smaill <sma...@SPAMinf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
>> WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes:
>> > On 8 Dez., 23:37, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>> >> Aleph_0 is not a length, nor an area, nor a volume.
>> > If it was a whole number or integer, as Cantor insisted, then it could
>> > be used to define a length or an area or a volume etc.
>> Cantor defined it as a cardinal number;
>> he did not propose any notion of multiplication of,
>> eg real numbers by transfinite cardinals.
> You are badly informed.
Then please inform me;
did Cantor consider 3.14159... to be a cardinal number?
In which of Cantor's number classes does 3.14159... fall?
> Regards, WM