Date: Dec 10, 2012 8:14 PM Author: Halitsky Subject: Sorry! I meant set=2, not set =1 in last post ... In my last post, set=1 here:
"(However, I?d still like to eventually finish the 4-ups as well
because for subset=S, method=N, fold=a1, set=1, the plot for u*e not
only hit me right between the eyes, but did so strongly I was almost
should have been set=2.
You've already seen the 4-up for set = 1.