Date: Dec 12, 2012 6:07 AM
Author: Alan Smaill
Subject: Re: fom - 01 - preface

WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes:

> On 11 Dez., 12:54, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> <spamt...@library.lspace.org.invalid> wrote:

>> In <virgil-2FC1D7.13530210122...@BIGNEWS.USENETMONSTER.COM>, on
>> 12/10/2012
>>    at 01:53 PM, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> said:
>>

>> >In order to define the product of a real number times a
>> >transfinite, the definition must hold for all reals and all
>> >transfinites.

>>
>> There's a more fundamental problem; she/he/it is conflating cardinals,

>
> Cantor was a male. So "he" would be appropriate.


And the problem is passed over in silence by WM.

Such is the way of the Prophet.


>
> Regards, WM


--
Alan Smaill