Date: Dec 12, 2012 6:07 AM
Author: Alan Smaill
Subject: Re: fom - 01 - preface
WM <email@example.com> writes:
> On 11 Dez., 12:54, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> <spamt...@library.lspace.org.invalid> wrote:
>> In <virgil-2FC1D7.13530210122...@BIGNEWS.USENETMONSTER.COM>, on
>> at 01:53 PM, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> said:
>> >In order to define the product of a real number times a
>> >transfinite, the definition must hold for all reals and all
>> There's a more fundamental problem; she/he/it is conflating cardinals,
> Cantor was a male. So "he" would be appropriate.
And the problem is passed over in silence by WM.
Such is the way of the Prophet.
> Regards, WM