Date: Dec 13, 2012 4:27 PM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: On the infinite binary Tree
On 13 Dez., 20:57, Zuhair <zaljo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Are you are too dishonest, to confess your error? Or do you really not

> > understand, that your pieces of paths are irrelevant?

>

> They are indeed relevant.

For what?

> We don't need the zero before the decimal

> point at all, all what we need is the string of digits AFTER the

> decimal,

i.e., after the 0. So the string begins with 0 as I said and not with

1 as you tried to show.

> Your argument is simply the following:

>

> All reals are definable by parameter free finite formulas.

>

> Since we have countably many of those formulas.

>

> Then we have countably many reals.

>

> This argument is FALSE, simply because not all reals are definable by

> parameter free finite formulas.

Wrong. My argument is simply that you cannot find out by nodes which

paths I use to construct the complete Binary Tree. Therefore you

cannot defined by nodes which paths are missing.

Regards, WM