Date: Dec 14, 2012 1:30 AM
Subject: Re: On the infinite binary Tree

On 14 Dez., 00:49, Virgil <> wrote:

> WM's allegedly complete  infinite binary trees are never incomplete.


> Every subset of N should correspond to a different path, the one
> branching left at just those levels whose numbers are in the set, and
> right at all other levels.


> and N has more subsets than WM's tree has
> paths.

Then tell me one single subset/path that is missing after I have
constructed the CIBT by means of all finite paths with the ending
xxx... (to be published after you will have announced your finding).

Regards, WM