Date: Dec 15, 2012 12:43 AM
Author: Ray Koopman
Subject: Re: Thanks for doing those two plots - yes - we agree on what we're seeing
On Dec 14, 8:34 pm, Ray Koopman <koop...@sfu.ca> wrote:

> On Dec 14, 5:26 pm, djh <halitsk...@att.net> wrote:

>> Thanks for doing those two plots.

>>

>> You wrote:

>>

>> "The biggest difference I see is that the SE's in set 2 are more

>> consistent than those in set 1, especially for L > 90 or so. However,

>> that could be just a sample-size artifact."

>>

>> Yes - we agree on the difference we're seeing.

>>

>> And I'm therefore hoping you'll tell me there's a way to reliably

>> decide the sample-size artifact question.

>>

>> Is there?

>

> Multiply each SE by the square root of its n, then plot.

> Also, you might try plotting the points without connecting them,

> which will make it easier to see holes.

You should also plot SEP against L. (Actually,

those should have been the first plots you did.)