Date: Dec 24, 2012 1:43 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: "Simple" Refutation of Cantor's Proof Fails

In article 
<cb69a3b8-dcd8-4818-965d-885319b8e8d3@g6g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 24 Dez., 16:17, George Greene <gree...@email.unc.edu> wrote:
> > On Dec 24, 6:29 am, hel...@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de (Phillip Helbig---
> >
> > undress to reply) wrote:

> > > You are missing the point.  The whole idea of the diagonal argument is
> >
> > No, Phil, YOU are missing the point.  YOU ARE NEW.
> > Herc has been here FOR A DECADE.  YOU should look back.
> > Everything you are about to say HAS BEEN SAID a dozen times
> > already.

>
> But it has not been understood by most matheologians.

Including , and usually limited t WM himself.

> They have not
> yet understood that everything that happens in a Cantor-list happens
> there at a finite distance from the origin (i.e.e from the first
> line).


And since every line is a finite distance from the first line, it can
all happen at once.

> But matheologians are so stupid

Only WM is that stupid.
--