Date: Dec 24, 2012 5:18 PM
Author: Graham Cooper
Subject: Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
On Dec 25, 4:48 am, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Dec 24, 4:01 am, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > +----->

> > | 0. 542..

> > | 0. 983..

> > | 0. 143..

> > | 0. 543..

> > | ...

> > v

>

> > OK - THINK

>

> Induction

only in the HR sense Will!

OK some great replies here!

I think WM point is correct here, the ENTIRE LIST can exist

+----->

| 0. 542..

| 0. 983..

| 0. 143..

| 0. 543..

| ...

v

each digit a FINITE distance from the Origin.

There is no constructible issue with the List itself.

----------------------

And GG has a good point, once he saw my 2 claims Sequitur together

[1] you change each digit ONE AT A TIME

0.694...

but this process NEVER STOPS

[2] and you NEVER CONSTRUCT A NEW DIGIT SEQUENCE!

----------------------

this is actually 100% correct under Static and Process analysis.

----------------------

GG counter example of

f(x) = 2*x

HOLDING for the infinite domain

is a good point however, although

he had to hand pick the example so

it doesn't contradict

[1]

[1]->[2]

[2]

You never construct a new digit Sequence

QED

Merry Xmas!

Herc

--

www.CAMGIRLS.com

TOTAL: $2834 2012-12-21 Fri

Not the End of the World!