```Date: Dec 26, 2012 12:15 AM
Author: Graham Cooper
Subject: Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof

On Dec 26, 1:23 pm, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:> In article> <aa637598-f327-464f-954b-9cdbe4c87...@i2g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>,>  Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:>> > > Since the constructed string must differ from each string listed in L in> > > a way that gives it a different value from that listed string, how can> > > it possibly still be among a set of values from which it is by> > > construction excluded?>> > the size of the string is not fixed.>> The one to be constructed is constructed  to be of the same length as> the ones listed.>>>> > You construct a portion, you construct another portion, and you never> > stop.>> One usually creates a rule which defines all the digits of the> construction simultaneously.>Right but your rule is just applied to one digit at a timeand it equally applies to the whole plane.+----->| 0. 542..| 0. 983..| 0. 143..| 0. 543..| ...vAD = 0.656...Transpose Plane +-----> | 0. 666.. | 0. 556.. | 0. 666.. | 0. 666.. | ... vD = 0.656...Just use the Transpose Plane intermediate step to see your error.Herc
```