Date: Dec 26, 2012 1:20 AM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Simple NON-Refutation of Cantor's Proof
In article

<f4460baa-6cbf-4a42-8285-dbcb6dcf2f73@l3g2000pbq.googlegroups.com>,

Graham Cooper <grahamcooper7@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Dec 26, 1:23 pm, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> > In article

> > <aa637598-f327-464f-954b-9cdbe4c87...@i2g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>,

> > Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >

> > > > Since the constructed string must differ from each string listed in L in

> > > > a way that gives it a different value from that listed string, how can

> > > > it possibly still be among a set of values from which it is by

> > > > construction excluded?

> >

> > > the size of the string is not fixed.

> >

> > The one to be constructed is constructed to be of the same length as

> > the ones listed.

> >

> >

> >

> > > You construct a portion, you construct another portion, and you never

> > > stop.

> >

> > One usually creates a rule which defines all the digits of the

> > construction simultaneously.

> >

>

> Right but your rule is just applied to one digit at a time

Not when it is being applied to all infinitely many strings

simultaneously.

--