```Date: Dec 26, 2012 2:11 AM
Author: plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
Subject: pilot wave in superconductivity and polarization Chapt15.34<br> explaining Superconductivity from Maxwell Equations #1113 New Physics #1233<br> ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

My mistake, in that the incoming light in the Dr. Goodstein experimentis unpolarized beam of light. It could be just a fancy heavy dutyflashlight in that equipment. For it shows the demonstration, withoutthe oblique filter in Halliday & Resnick, 1988, page 855 just beforeit talks of the law of Malus.So my task is to explain the oblique filter causing light to gothrough. It is really not that easy. And not as easy as saying thatthe light waves have components along both the x and y axis that theoblique angle uses. It is more involved.The easiest way of explaining the episode 50of Particles and Waves in The Mechanical Universeseries of where David Goodstein performs a demonstration to a Caltechclassroom is to say that if you have a light beam and two filters ofvertical and horizontal that all the light is blocked, until you placea oblique filter in between and then some of the light gets through.The easiest explanation is that there is a pilot wave formed. A pilotwave just as the Aharonov-Bohm experiment with solenoid shows a phasechange.And I believe that this demonstration of the oblique filter is a proofthat light is a double transverse wave, not a single transverse wave,for a double transverse wave allows the changing B field to intersecta closed loop of the E field and thus creating a secondary new E fieldwhich would form the pilot wave.So how can a light wave consisting of double transverse wave ofmagnetic monopoles create a pilot wave? A pilot wave would be a Efield in front of the wave itself. Now you cannot have a pilot wave infront of a single transverse wave, for you need a double transversewave.If light were a single transverse wave of this:|_shaped like a L with 2 vertices, one of E and the other of B fieldthen it would not create a forefrontpilot E field.But if light were double transverse as this picture:__|__    |Then the B field passing through the E field would create a newadditional E field in front of the moving wave. So there would be anadded E field, and call it the guiding wave or the pilot wave,although it was produced by the E and B field.So in the Goodstein demonstration, the pilot wave is passing throughthe vertical and forms a new wavefront all over again. As if the firstvertical filter did not influence the second oblique filter and lasthorizontal filter at all by allowing a lot of light to get through.In my opinion,  the problem of Goodstein's explanation is that he istrying to convey some change has occurred with the photons as theintermediate oblique filter has been placed between the vertical andhorizontal. And there is nothing in a single transverse wave to allowchanges. So that Dr. Goodstein cannot be explaining "you guys thoughtyou were going up and down but half of you are .."With the double transverse wave theory, everytime a wave front ofphotons enters a medium, the pilot wave has opportunity to change.I figured if I stuck it out long enough on polarization that it wouldafford a second proof that light is double transverse. The first proofis that the speed of light is a constant regardless of wavelength orfrequency, only if double transverse with destructive interference.So the pilot wave is a secondary E field and that would then mean thatI do not need neutrinos as forming superconductivity.Google's New-Newsgroups censors AP posts, especially the mobilephones such as iphone deleted all of AP's post,  and halted a properarchiving of AP, but Drexel's Math Forum does not censor and my postsin sequential archive form is seen here:http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986Archimedes Plutoniumhttp://www.iw.net/~a_plutoniumwhole entire Universe is just one big atomwhere dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
```