Date: Dec 27, 2012 7:40 PM
Author: Robert Hansen
Subject: Re: A Point on Understanding
On Dec 27, 2012, at 7:35 PM, kirby urner <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Answer: we don't need the concept of "limit" to shape the question in
> the first place. This isn't a math language where "perfect
> continuity" is even defined, let alone necessary. This isn't
> calculus. So what? Most of math isn't.
So why did you bring in epsilon-delta? That was like mixing apples and furniture.
Why didn't you just say "Can a curve be flat if I define a curve as not being flat?" The answer is clearly, No.