Date: Dec 28, 2012 10:32 PM
Author: Graham Cooper
Subject: Re: CHANGING THE DIAGONAL!
On Dec 29, 11:37 am, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> In article
> Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +----->
> > | 0. 542..
> > | 0. 983..
> > | 0. 143..
> > | 0. 543..
> > | ...
> > v
> > OK - THINK - don't back explain to me.
> > You run down the Diagonal 5 8 3 ...
> > IN YOUR MIND -
> > 
> > you change each digit ONE AT A TIME
> > 0.694...
> > but this process NEVER STOPS
> > 
> > so you NEVER CONSTRUCT A NEW DIGIT SEQUENCE!
> That is like saying that the function f+ |N -> |N : x \_--> x^2
> never ends.
Right! but since it has no free variable input to apply it's safe to
extrapolate results toward infinity.
> As soon as one has a completed rule by which values of the function are
> determined from its domain to its codomain, the function is defined.
> E.g., f:|N --> |N : 2 |--> 2*x+1
> is completed function
> Thus a rule or function for determining anti-diagonal digits creates the
> entire anti-diagonal list of digits in one step.
dependent on the input.
In this case, you cannot ANTI-DIAGONALISE an infinite set.
Every digit you change is substitutable by another digit in another