Date: Dec 29, 2012 7:19 PM
Author: camgirls@hush.com
Subject: Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
On Dec 30, 9:22 am, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> > > NOTHING EVER *NEEDS* to be constructed, DUMBASS!

> > > YOU DON'T represent the function f(x)=2*x by

>

> > The derivative f'(x)=2

>

> > The integral f*(x)=x^2

>

> AN integral, but not THE integral.

>

>

It HAS an integral!

It HAS a derivative.

Your imaginary textual froth you make up and call functions DO NOT!!

AD(pos) = 6 IFF DIAG(pos) < 5

AD(pos) = 5 OTHERWISE

What is the DERIVATIVE of that RUBBISH?

You CLAIM it is completed to INFINITY!

W H A T * I S * T H E * I N T E G R A L ?

ANWER THE QUESTIONS VIRGIL

OR STOP TRASHING ALL MY POSTS!

Herc