Date: Dec 31, 2012 1:42 AM
Author: John Jens
Subject: Re: From Fermat little theorem to Fermat Last Theorem

On Sunday, December 30, 2012 9:51:08 PM UTC+2, quasi wrote:
> John Jens wrote:
>
>
>

> >I pick a < p ,proved that do not exist a , b , c
>
> >rational numbers with 0<a=<b<c and a<p to satisfy
>
> >a^p+b^p=c^p
>
>
>
> No, you never proved the above claim.
>
>
>
> You only thought you did.
>
>
>
> First you tried to show that the equation
>
>
>
> a^p + b^p = c^p
>
>
>
> has no solutions in integers a,b,c,p subject to the
>
> conditions 0 < a <= b < c, p > 2, a < p.
>
>
>
> For the sake of argument, let's allow that claim.
>
>
>
> Then you attempted to extend to positive rationals a,b,c. To do
>
> that, you scale a,b,c down, dividing each by a positive integer
>
> large enough so the new value of a is less than p. Then you
>
> claim a contradiction since you already showed that a < p is
>
> impossible. But you showed that for positive integer values of
>
> a, not for positive rational values of a, so (barring circular
>
> reasoning) you don't have your claimed contradiction.
>
>
>
> quasi


I intentionally choose a < p ,there's no crime to choose
an a natural, a < p.
If for a < p ,a,b,c, naturals , we can multiply the inequality a^p + b^p != c^p with any rational number,
it will remain a inequality.