```Date: Jan 1, 2013 3:56 AM
Author: INFINITY POWER
Subject: Re: This Is a Failed *PROOF* that AD never produces a New Digit Sequence!

On Jan 1, 6:42 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> On 30 Dez. 2012, 23:31, George Greene <gree...@email.unc.edu> wrote:>> > YOU CAN'T PROVE IT.  We by contrast HAVE EASILY> > proved that since for EVERY n, the nth position of the diagonal> > DIFFERS from the nth R on the list AT Rn's nth position,> > THE ANTI-DIAGONAL *IS*NOT*ON* the list.  If it WERE on, it would> > have to be on it *AT* some row n. But the anti-diagonal IS NOT> > on the list at row n because Rn DIFFERS from the anti-diagonal IN> > POSITION n.>> But if you use a list of all finite sequences s(n) (of every finite> length n) then there is always a finite sequence s(n) that is> identical to the initial sequence d(n) of the diagonal. And as the> diagonal can only be investigated up to any finite sequence, comparing> s(n) with d(n), it is clear that Cantor's argument shows only one side> of the medal, namely there is no sequence s(n) that is identical to> d(n) for every n. The other side is that, by construction of the list,> there is for every n and every d(n) an s(n) = d(n) in the list.Right!  This is VERY TRIVIAL PROOF and points [3] and [4] are TRIVIALLY CORRECT!segment = finite sequence of digits[3] every segment of every finite size can be listed.[4] every SEQUENCE of segments can be listedby induction, a SEQUENCE of SEQUENCE OF DIGITSis a SEQUENCE of DIGITS!Notice George just goes off on Tangents about definitions and ignores the topic.GEORGE WHY DONT YOU PUT YOUR MONEY WHERE YOUR MOUTH ISAND ACTUALLY CALCULATE AN ANTI-DIAGONAL FOR ONCESO YOU CAN SEE HOW STUPID THEY (YOU) ARE!******CHALLENGE TO LECTURER GEORGE GREENE*******LIST  R1=  0.314159265358979323 ...  R2=  0.2718281828459045235360 ...  R3=  0.333333333333333333 ...  R4=  0.888888888888888888888888 ...  R5=  0.0123456789012345678901234 ...  R6=  0.14142135623730950488 .......LIST   R1= < <314><15><926><535><8979><323> ... >   R2= < <27><18281828><459045><235360> ... >   R3= < <333><333><333><333><333><333> ... >   R4= < <888888888888888888888><8><88> ... >   R5= < <0123456789><0123456789><01234 ... >   R6= < <1><414><21356><2373095><0488> ... >....What is missing?  <in segment notation>*****************************George I've 10 times the ESSAYS ARE INFINITEYou said IN THIS THREAD I didn't DEFINE THE TERMSSO I DID AGAIN!  And you ignored it!STACK OF ESSAYS_______WRITTEN ON LOBACHAVESKIAN PAPER!<SENTENCE 1> <SENTENCE 2> <SENTENCE 3> .....CHANGE ALL THE WORDS YOU WANT!YOU CANNOT COME UP WITH ONE SINGLE NEW SENTENCE!
```