Date: Jan 1, 2013 10:29 PM
Subject: Re: Uncountable Diagonal Problem
"Ross A. Finlayson" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Here, the consideration is of the nested intervals, formed a la
> Cantor's first, from a well-ordering of the reals.
But in that proof Cantor does not require a well ordering of the reals,
only an arbitrary sequence of reals which he shown cannot to be all of
them, thus no such "counting" or sequence of some reals can be a count
or sequnce of all of them.