Date: Jan 2, 2013 11:38 AM
Author: Graham Cooper
Subject: Re: This Is a Failed *PROOF* that AD never produces a New Digit Sequence!
On Jan 2, 7:46 am, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz

<spamt...@library.lspace.org.invalid> wrote:

> In <kbu8cc$ed...@dont-email.me>, on 01/01/2013

> at 06:56 PM, "INFINITY POWER" <infin...@limited.com> said:

>

> >Right! This is VERY TRIVIAL PROOF and points [3] and [4] are

> >TRIVIALLY CORRECT!

> >segment = finite sequence of digits

> >[3] every segment of every finite size can be listed.

> >[4] every SEQUENCE of segments can be listed

> >by induction, a SEQUENCE of SEQUENCE OF DIGITS

> >is a SEQUENCE of DIGITS!

>

> Not even close. What is true is that given a sequence of segments

> there is a sequence that is the concatenation of all of the segments.

>

> --

> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>

>

LOL! Seymour is here to take me on!

big bigger even-bigger!

Herc