```Date: Jan 4, 2013 1:03 AM
Author: Koobee Wublee
Subject: Re: Simplified Twin Paradox Resolution.

On Jan 3, 5:52 pm, Sylvia Else <syl...@not.at.this.address> wrote:> Instead, on Earth there is a clock and a camcorder with a very powerful> telescopic lens and a tranceiver There is also a spacecraft travelling> at velocity v towards Earth, similarly equipped. For simplicity, we> treat Earth + clock + camcorder + transceivers as a single point.> Similarly for the spacecraft.>> After some time T in its own frame, the spacecraft encounters a most> similar spacecraft headed towards Earth at velocity v relative to Earth.> As they pass, the first spacecraft transmits its entire camcorder> recording to the second spacecraft, and the second spacecraft's clock is> set to the value shown by the first spacecraft's clock. The camcorder on> the second spacecraft then starts recording, continuing the recording it> just received.Instead of v, let?s say (B = v / c) for simplicity.  The earth isPoint #0, outbound spacecraft is Point #1, and inbound spacecraft isPoint #2.According to the Lorentz transform, relative speeds are:**  B_00^2 = 0, speed of #0 as observed by #0**  B_01^2 = B^2, speed of #1 as observed by #0**  B_02^2 = B^2, speed of #2 as observed by #0**  B_10^2 = B^2, speed of #0 as observed by #1**  B_11^2 = 0, speed of #1 as observed by #1**  B_12^2 = 4 B^2 / (1 ? B^2), speed of #2 as observed by #1**  B_20^2 = B^2, speed of #0 as observed by #2**  B_21^2 = 4 B^2 / (1 ? B^2), speed of #1 as observed by #2**  B_22^2 = 0, speed of #2 as observed by #2When Point #0 is observed by all, the Minkowski spacetime (divided byc^2) is:**  dt_00^2 (1 ? B_00^2) = dt_10^2 (1 ? B_10^2) = dt_20^2 (1 ? B_20^2)When Point #1 is observed by all, the Minkowski spacetime (divided byc^2) is:**  dt_01^2 (1 ? B_01^2) = dt_11^2 (1 ? B_11^2) = dt_21^2 (1 ? B_21^2)When Point #2 is observed by all, the Minkowski spacetime (divided byc^2) is:**  dt_02^2 (1 ? B_02^2) = dt_12^2 (1 ? B_12^2) = dt_22^2 (1 ? B_22^2)Where**  dt_00 = Local rate of time flow at Point #0**  dt_01 = Rate of time flow at #1 as observed by #0**  dt_02 = Rate of time flow at #2 as observed by #0**  dt_10 = Rate of time flow at #0 as observed by #1**  dt_11 = Local rate of time flow at Point #1**  dt_12 = Rate of time flow at #2 as observed by #1**  dt_20 = Rate of time flow at #0 as observed by #2**  dt_21 = Rate of time flow at #1 as observed by #2**  dt_22 = Local rate of time flow at Point #2So, with all the pertinent variables identified, the contradiction ofthe twins? paradox is glaring right at anyone with a thinking brain.<shrug>Did PD get it right?> [snipped garbage]Of course not, what do you expect from an Einstein Dingleberry?<shrug>After abandoning the projection crap, is Tom very busy trying to findan excuse to resolve this through projection again?  Koobee Wublee isnot surprised since Tom has already decided SR as a valid hypothesisdespite lack of any professional validations.  <shrug>POINT BLANK IN YOUR FACES, PD, PAUL (ANDERSEN), AND TOM (ROBERTS)!<shrug>
```