Date: Jan 6, 2013 3:56 AM
Author: Michael Klemm
Subject: Re: From Fermat little theorem to Fermat Last Theorem
consider the case p =3, proved by Euler. Then you see that the assumption a
< p in line 4 is not at all justified.
"John Jens" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message
> I won't go back to warn you about possible mistakes in your "proof",
> rather I will only tell you that if you have any hope to be taken
> seriously by anyone seriously related to mathematics you better type down
> your stuff with LaTeX, either in your blog or in a PDF file, otherwise
> many mathematicians, like me say, won't even take the time to try to read
> all that in ASCII.
PDF file http://primemath.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/fltflt.pdf