Date: Jan 12, 2013 10:02 PM
Author: William Elliot
Subject: Revised Proof of the Collatz Conjecture
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013, email@example.com wrote:
> I now have a proof that there are no cycles other than the trivial (1,2)
> cycle for the Collatz function on the positive integers. I have replaced
> my previous paper (the flawed proof of the Collatz conjecture) with this
> new paper at the same link.
> I am continuing to meet with my colleagues and discuss the matter. As
> always, I would appreciate any and all comments, even if you just want
> to call me a "delusional crank" again.
You're delusional to think this group remembers your precious link.