Date: Jan 15, 2013 2:23 AM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 191
In article

<2efa9aa9-2968-4886-a1c7-24f905c5750f@x3g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,

WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 14 Jan., 23:09, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

>

> > It is sets of nodes and sets of paths which are missing, not merely

> > individual nodes or paths. And which paths are be missing cannot be

> > determined without a list of those paths which are included.

>

> So you deny that mathematics of numbers is based upon digits.

I have no idea what you mean, when I am talking about something the does

not require any numbers, except possibly as tags or names.

>

> But here is the list: All finite initial segments of all decimal

> expansions are included.

That is not a list. And for paths in a Complete Infinite Binary Tree,

decimal expansions are totally irrelevant and contra indicated.

So that WM is totally off base, again, as usual!

--